<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill 101, hum&#8230; 101&#8230; The School Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/</link>
	<description>French thoughts written in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mcyclops</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-12084</link>
		<dc:creator>mcyclops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-12084</guid>
		<description>Hi Ma Chouette,

I am not against French, and yes, my wife took him without telling me that she planning to stay. She is French Canadian and I am not so she is not affected and what she did is selfish at least.

If you need to protect your language by law, then your culture is in trouble! I do not think that French, being so beautiful and culturally rich, is in any trouble. It was here for 200 years without a law. A law to protect the right of French speakers was due in the 70s, but not in diminishing of the English population that is as Quebequer as you are Quebecoise.

Bonne journée!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ma Chouette,</p>
<p>I am not against French, and yes, my wife took him without telling me that she planning to stay. She is French Canadian and I am not so she is not affected and what she did is selfish at least.</p>
<p>If you need to protect your language by law, then your culture is in trouble! I do not think that French, being so beautiful and culturally rich, is in any trouble. It was here for 200 years without a law. A law to protect the right of French speakers was due in the 70s, but not in diminishing of the English population that is as Quebequer as you are Quebecoise.</p>
<p>Bonne journée!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ma_chouette</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-12079</link>
		<dc:creator>ma_chouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-12079</guid>
		<description>I am a 20 year old from QC and 100% French and proud of it. If you are against the language law, it&#039;s that you are against French. If you look at New Brunswick, the percentage of the population who speaks French diminishes every day. Once this generation has passed, how many of mine will keep speaking French. Our businesses have to deal with the rest of the country everyday so English is a must. Not having the law, do you really think people would keep learning it? And with the lowering birth rate (due to schooling, careers and people waiting to be older to have children) we are under the reproduction rate. That means more immigrants will have to come in. They would of course, learn English, since it&#039;s the language that opens doors. Again, in a generation, no more French. It would be as rare as someone speaking Latin. 
To Manuel: Your wife took your child to Québec KNOWING he would only be allowed to attend a French school. Think about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 20 year old from QC and 100% French and proud of it. If you are against the language law, it&#8217;s that you are against French. If you look at New Brunswick, the percentage of the population who speaks French diminishes every day. Once this generation has passed, how many of mine will keep speaking French. Our businesses have to deal with the rest of the country everyday so English is a must. Not having the law, do you really think people would keep learning it? And with the lowering birth rate (due to schooling, careers and people waiting to be older to have children) we are under the reproduction rate. That means more immigrants will have to come in. They would of course, learn English, since it&#8217;s the language that opens doors. Again, in a generation, no more French. It would be as rare as someone speaking Latin.<br />
To Manuel: Your wife took your child to Québec KNOWING he would only be allowed to attend a French school. Think about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Berlanga</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11873</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Berlanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11873</guid>
		<description>Dear Stan,

Bill 101 and Bill 104 are partially good in the sense that they protect the right of French speaking people, but at expenses of English speakers and allophones. I move to Ontario 10 years ago and for reasons BEYOND my control I have to move to Quebec (my wife took my kid here &quot;temporarly&quot; then divorced me). I speak no French, but I have not right to educate my son in English because I was not born in Canada. I did not come to Qubec, I came to Ontario, and by cirrcumstances had to came. Why the government is going to control the language of education of MY kid? Why the government is going to control the language of a sign I want to put in my business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stan,</p>
<p>Bill 101 and Bill 104 are partially good in the sense that they protect the right of French speaking people, but at expenses of English speakers and allophones. I move to Ontario 10 years ago and for reasons BEYOND my control I have to move to Quebec (my wife took my kid here &#8220;temporarly&#8221; then divorced me). I speak no French, but I have not right to educate my son in English because I was not born in Canada. I did not come to Qubec, I came to Ontario, and by cirrcumstances had to came. Why the government is going to control the language of education of MY kid? Why the government is going to control the language of a sign I want to put in my business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan squires</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator>stan squires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11870</guid>
		<description>I am from vancouver and i wanted to say that the language problem in Quebec goes back to 1837 when the people in upper and lower canada wanted to get their independence from England like the americans did during their war of independence from 1775-1783.Unfortunality it didn&#039;t work out in canada.It was at that time that Lord Durham from england advised the gov. of england that it would be a good idea to get rid of the french language in canada.England was concerned that canada might get its independence like the U.S.A. did earlier on.
 Ever since then the gov.of canada has been trying to get rid of the french language in Quebec.Bill 101 was a good step forward for the french language,but the canadian gov.didn&#039;t like that bill so it is still trying to block the french language.The supreme court ruling on bill 104 is a slander against the language rights of the french people of Quebec.It should be fought against by all progressive people in canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am from vancouver and i wanted to say that the language problem in Quebec goes back to 1837 when the people in upper and lower canada wanted to get their independence from England like the americans did during their war of independence from 1775-1783.Unfortunality it didn&#8217;t work out in canada.It was at that time that Lord Durham from england advised the gov. of england that it would be a good idea to get rid of the french language in canada.England was concerned that canada might get its independence like the U.S.A. did earlier on.<br />
 Ever since then the gov.of canada has been trying to get rid of the french language in Quebec.Bill 101 was a good step forward for the french language,but the canadian gov.didn&#8217;t like that bill so it is still trying to block the french language.The supreme court ruling on bill 104 is a slander against the language rights of the french people of Quebec.It should be fought against by all progressive people in canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryfrenchguy</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11433</link>
		<dc:creator>angryfrenchguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11433</guid>
		<description>Hey John.  I rarely read comment on older threads.  Almost missed you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John.  I rarely read comment on older threads.  Almost missed you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>AngryFrenchGuy,

Well firstly let me thank you for this site.  I discovered it a few days ago and I&#039;ve been reading the articles and user comments ever since.  Fascinating and interesting reading.  I can&#039;t say I agree with a lot of what I&#039;ve seen, but I certainly appreciate the viewpoints.

I picked this particular article to introduce myself because of a comparison to 101 school laws that I&#039;ve always noticed, but never see mentioned.  That being the rules regarding who is allowed to attend French-language schools in other provinces.

I&#039;m an Atlantic Canadian and a  unilingual Anglophone who went to school in English.  And even though there was a French-language high school in the area, I wouldn&#039;t have been able to attend that school.  Why?  Because I&#039;m a unilingual anglophone, Irish, no familial ties to Francophones and only basic grade school french classes.

Now, does this not seem remarkably similar to the rules regarding who can attend English schools in Quebec?  

Quebec is a province with a Francophone majority. It offers its Anglo minority schooling in English and sets rules on who can attend.  My province has an Anglophone majority and French-language schooling is offered to our Francophone minority with rules on who is able to attend.  Seems to make sense to me.

The difference being that here there is no law.  It is a school board rule.  And there are certainly no real or perceived threats to English driving  these rules.

Kinda lost my train of thought there.  Hopefully it made a bit of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AngryFrenchGuy,</p>
<p>Well firstly let me thank you for this site.  I discovered it a few days ago and I&#8217;ve been reading the articles and user comments ever since.  Fascinating and interesting reading.  I can&#8217;t say I agree with a lot of what I&#8217;ve seen, but I certainly appreciate the viewpoints.</p>
<p>I picked this particular article to introduce myself because of a comparison to 101 school laws that I&#8217;ve always noticed, but never see mentioned.  That being the rules regarding who is allowed to attend French-language schools in other provinces.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an Atlantic Canadian and a  unilingual Anglophone who went to school in English.  And even though there was a French-language high school in the area, I wouldn&#8217;t have been able to attend that school.  Why?  Because I&#8217;m a unilingual anglophone, Irish, no familial ties to Francophones and only basic grade school french classes.</p>
<p>Now, does this not seem remarkably similar to the rules regarding who can attend English schools in Quebec?  </p>
<p>Quebec is a province with a Francophone majority. It offers its Anglo minority schooling in English and sets rules on who can attend.  My province has an Anglophone majority and French-language schooling is offered to our Francophone minority with rules on who is able to attend.  Seems to make sense to me.</p>
<p>The difference being that here there is no law.  It is a school board rule.  And there are certainly no real or perceived threats to English driving  these rules.</p>
<p>Kinda lost my train of thought there.  Hopefully it made a bit of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcyclops</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-8624</link>
		<dc:creator>mcyclops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-8624</guid>
		<description>You need to check your facts, there are public French schools in all the other provinces to help you guys not to integrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to check your facts, there are public French schools in all the other provinces to help you guys not to integrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-6142</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-6142</guid>
		<description>You are a racist making excuses for french canadian racism. I will be filing a complaint against you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a racist making excuses for french canadian racism. I will be filing a complaint against you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-1/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-4086</guid>
		<description>The point missing here, if you want to compare Canada to the United States, is that Canada is an officially bilingual country and the United States is not, despite the efforts of the Province of Quebec to become a unilingual corner of Canada. Quebec, and its engine specifically (Montreal), was built by both English and French hands, for the last 300 hundred years. In fact, it was the very predominence of the English in business and power that caused so much resentment among Francophones. Thus, Quebec belongs to both Enlgish and French Quebecers, and the English have been operating as a distinct community within Quebec for hundreds of years, building their own self-funding institutions along the way, that is until the francophone majority changed the rules, nationalised education and healthcare, and redefined Quebec as French, to the exclusion of one of the founding memebrs of our Province, the English.

Second, the reason why Jewish schools exist, is because up until a few years a go, there was only a Catholic School Board and a Protestant School Board. Why not allow minorities to have their own curriculum, which by the way is semi-private and not fully funded by government. In fact the deal is, Jewish schools get tuition covered for the same amount it costs the Quebec government to fund a student in the public school system. Parents make up the difference. Every time a majority in Quebec redefines itself, 

Lastly, Francophones did not/do no fund the English school board exclusively. Remember, English language speakers contribute their fair share to the Quebec tax system themselves. In fact, if you left schools to be funded at the local/municipal level, i&#039;m sure you would see a vibrant English language school system fully funded by English dollars, just like English language schools and hospitals were before they were nationalised. Your logic reminds me of the thief who steals the television and then demands thanks from the victim for leaving the stero behind. 

Lastly to the ridiculous logic regarding racism and segregation of the english school system. The difference here is choice. The English have been operating in Quebec for well over 200 years. They attend the English school system VOLUNTARILY. The injustic of segregation is when a minority or majority is FORCED to be separated. The English of Quebec have a choice, its the French who are restricted from choosing what&#039;s good for themselves and their children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point missing here, if you want to compare Canada to the United States, is that Canada is an officially bilingual country and the United States is not, despite the efforts of the Province of Quebec to become a unilingual corner of Canada. Quebec, and its engine specifically (Montreal), was built by both English and French hands, for the last 300 hundred years. In fact, it was the very predominence of the English in business and power that caused so much resentment among Francophones. Thus, Quebec belongs to both Enlgish and French Quebecers, and the English have been operating as a distinct community within Quebec for hundreds of years, building their own self-funding institutions along the way, that is until the francophone majority changed the rules, nationalised education and healthcare, and redefined Quebec as French, to the exclusion of one of the founding memebrs of our Province, the English.</p>
<p>Second, the reason why Jewish schools exist, is because up until a few years a go, there was only a Catholic School Board and a Protestant School Board. Why not allow minorities to have their own curriculum, which by the way is semi-private and not fully funded by government. In fact the deal is, Jewish schools get tuition covered for the same amount it costs the Quebec government to fund a student in the public school system. Parents make up the difference. Every time a majority in Quebec redefines itself, </p>
<p>Lastly, Francophones did not/do no fund the English school board exclusively. Remember, English language speakers contribute their fair share to the Quebec tax system themselves. In fact, if you left schools to be funded at the local/municipal level, i&#8217;m sure you would see a vibrant English language school system fully funded by English dollars, just like English language schools and hospitals were before they were nationalised. Your logic reminds me of the thief who steals the television and then demands thanks from the victim for leaving the stero behind. </p>
<p>Lastly to the ridiculous logic regarding racism and segregation of the english school system. The difference here is choice. The English have been operating in Quebec for well over 200 years. They attend the English school system VOLUNTARILY. The injustic of segregation is when a minority or majority is FORCED to be separated. The English of Quebec have a choice, its the French who are restricted from choosing what&#8217;s good for themselves and their children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generation 101. A Movie About My Country. &#171; AngryFrenchGuy</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Generation 101. A Movie About My Country. &#171; AngryFrenchGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>[...] Jew, a feminist from Palestine and a guy from Madagascar who are now staunch supporters of the education measures in bill 101 give their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jew, a feminist from Palestine and a guy from Madagascar who are now staunch supporters of the education measures in bill 101 give their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
