<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill 101, hum&#8230; 101&#8230; The School Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 20:22:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Québecautochtone</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-17057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Québecautochtone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-17057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sarah, why isn&#039;t every single school in the USA bilingual with Spanish and English? Isn&#039;t it obvious most kids need bilingual education?

Because that&#039;s not how language rights work. Forcing everyone in Québec to learn English while sparing the Anglophones in Canada or the USA to effectiverly learn the other language is just plain Anglo-centric ego trip.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sarah, why isn&#8217;t every single school in the USA bilingual with Spanish and English? Isn&#8217;t it obvious most kids need bilingual education?</p>
<p>Because that&#8217;s not how language rights work. Forcing everyone in Québec to learn English while sparing the Anglophones in Canada or the USA to effectiverly learn the other language is just plain Anglo-centric ego trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Québecautochtone</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-17056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Québecautochtone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-17056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amasing how English-speakers will deny reality to go on to bash Québec. 

Accept this fact : Québec treats it&#039;s English minority better than Canada treats its French-speaking minority and MUCH better than USA treats it&#039;s Spanish-speaking minority. Some privileges of the English minority WILL be reduced to what is generally granted to other minorities in North America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amasing how English-speakers will deny reality to go on to bash Québec. </p>
<p>Accept this fact : Québec treats it&#8217;s English minority better than Canada treats its French-speaking minority and MUCH better than USA treats it&#8217;s Spanish-speaking minority. Some privileges of the English minority WILL be reduced to what is generally granted to other minorities in North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-16984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-16984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi.  I stumbled across this thread because I am currently looking up the law myself.  I am an American, descending from a Francophone mother, instructed in english but now living in Quebec, and my son is getting to 5 years old so I was looking at the options.

Here is what I don&#039;t get about this whole thing.  Why is there even a seperate English Language school board, and why are not all schools providing a complete bilingual education?  Is it not plainly (and painfully!)obvious that kids need to be thouroughly instructed in both languages these days?  I work here, and yes I learned french but I stuggle everday with the vocabulary and grammer, because I learned it as an adult and feel I will never fuly master it.  Conversely, some of my colleagues with weaker english skills continually have to struggle with their own difficulties getting their point accross to our other colleagues in western Canada...there is definitely a language barrier.  Thankfully, my son will never have to deal with either situation if he has bilingual instruction, AND he will be prepared for life inside and outside of Quebec.

As an anglophone parent in Quebec, I have the upperhand.  I can send my kid to french school without worrying too much about his English aptitude as long as I am doing my part at home.  Now, if I was a unilingual francophone parent, I would be PISSED that I had to send my child to a french instruction school with a lack-lustre english program.  I&#039;d be like, &quot;WTF Gouvernement de Quebec! I&#039;m paying my taxes can you PLEASE invest in my child&#039;s future!?&quot;  No wonder so many people here send their kids to private school.

Who cares about history, or who is the minority, majority, blah blah blah : this is tripe.  If you just take a moment to think about the future, about the awesome advantage a bilingual education offers to a child&#039;s development as well as career opportunities..well then every child in Quebec should be taking advantage of the opportunity to master these two languages, and the government should be working harder to ensure that happens

Because while your getting all passionate about your linguistic rights or lack there of, the next guy has already gotten over it.

HE is sending his kids to get educated bilingually....

And HIS kid is going to be competeing with yours for the jobs of the future...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I stumbled across this thread because I am currently looking up the law myself.  I am an American, descending from a Francophone mother, instructed in english but now living in Quebec, and my son is getting to 5 years old so I was looking at the options.</p>
<p>Here is what I don&#8217;t get about this whole thing.  Why is there even a seperate English Language school board, and why are not all schools providing a complete bilingual education?  Is it not plainly (and painfully!)obvious that kids need to be thouroughly instructed in both languages these days?  I work here, and yes I learned french but I stuggle everday with the vocabulary and grammer, because I learned it as an adult and feel I will never fuly master it.  Conversely, some of my colleagues with weaker english skills continually have to struggle with their own difficulties getting their point accross to our other colleagues in western Canada&#8230;there is definitely a language barrier.  Thankfully, my son will never have to deal with either situation if he has bilingual instruction, AND he will be prepared for life inside and outside of Quebec.</p>
<p>As an anglophone parent in Quebec, I have the upperhand.  I can send my kid to french school without worrying too much about his English aptitude as long as I am doing my part at home.  Now, if I was a unilingual francophone parent, I would be PISSED that I had to send my child to a french instruction school with a lack-lustre english program.  I&#8217;d be like, &#8220;WTF Gouvernement de Quebec! I&#8217;m paying my taxes can you PLEASE invest in my child&#8217;s future!?&#8221;  No wonder so many people here send their kids to private school.</p>
<p>Who cares about history, or who is the minority, majority, blah blah blah : this is tripe.  If you just take a moment to think about the future, about the awesome advantage a bilingual education offers to a child&#8217;s development as well as career opportunities..well then every child in Quebec should be taking advantage of the opportunity to master these two languages, and the government should be working harder to ensure that happens</p>
<p>Because while your getting all passionate about your linguistic rights or lack there of, the next guy has already gotten over it.</p>
<p>HE is sending his kids to get educated bilingually&#8230;.</p>
<p>And HIS kid is going to be competeing with yours for the jobs of the future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynn</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-16791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-16791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Furthermore, lets look at the picture as a whole here, Canada is our country (Quebec has not separated yet) and the Francophones are the minority in our country (as a whole) yet, Francophones in Quebec benefit from running an entire province w/very little input of the Anglophones here despite the fact Anglophones are a majority in Canada. Who is the better treated minority w/all the transfer payments etc...from our federal government? I this this is a no-brainer to be honest. It is quite evident who the best treated minority is, and it is NOT the Anglophones!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, lets look at the picture as a whole here, Canada is our country (Quebec has not separated yet) and the Francophones are the minority in our country (as a whole) yet, Francophones in Quebec benefit from running an entire province w/very little input of the Anglophones here despite the fact Anglophones are a majority in Canada. Who is the better treated minority w/all the transfer payments etc&#8230;from our federal government? I this this is a no-brainer to be honest. It is quite evident who the best treated minority is, and it is NOT the Anglophones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynn</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-16790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-16790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America is starting to offer French in their schools, should the Americans not pay for it since we all know Spanish is more widely used in the US and not French? 
As for financing of English schools, part of the finance comes from the Federal government and do Anglophones in the province not pay taxes???? Last I knew they did, there was even an article that some Anglos contributing to English school boards are being taxed at a higher rate than French schools. Hmmm unfair right?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America is starting to offer French in their schools, should the Americans not pay for it since we all know Spanish is more widely used in the US and not French?<br />
As for financing of English schools, part of the finance comes from the Federal government and do Anglophones in the province not pay taxes???? Last I knew they did, there was even an article that some Anglos contributing to English school boards are being taxed at a higher rate than French schools. Hmmm unfair right?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-16778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-16778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there are 4 CEGEPS. the 3 champlains and Dawson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are 4 CEGEPS. the 3 champlains and Dawson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcyclops</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-12084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcyclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-12084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ma Chouette,

I am not against French, and yes, my wife took him without telling me that she planning to stay. She is French Canadian and I am not so she is not affected and what she did is selfish at least.

If you need to protect your language by law, then your culture is in trouble! I do not think that French, being so beautiful and culturally rich, is in any trouble. It was here for 200 years without a law. A law to protect the right of French speakers was due in the 70s, but not in diminishing of the English population that is as Quebequer as you are Quebecoise.

Bonne journée!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ma Chouette,</p>
<p>I am not against French, and yes, my wife took him without telling me that she planning to stay. She is French Canadian and I am not so she is not affected and what she did is selfish at least.</p>
<p>If you need to protect your language by law, then your culture is in trouble! I do not think that French, being so beautiful and culturally rich, is in any trouble. It was here for 200 years without a law. A law to protect the right of French speakers was due in the 70s, but not in diminishing of the English population that is as Quebequer as you are Quebecoise.</p>
<p>Bonne journée!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ma_chouette</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-12079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ma_chouette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-12079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a 20 year old from QC and 100% French and proud of it. If you are against the language law, it&#039;s that you are against French. If you look at New Brunswick, the percentage of the population who speaks French diminishes every day. Once this generation has passed, how many of mine will keep speaking French. Our businesses have to deal with the rest of the country everyday so English is a must. Not having the law, do you really think people would keep learning it? And with the lowering birth rate (due to schooling, careers and people waiting to be older to have children) we are under the reproduction rate. That means more immigrants will have to come in. They would of course, learn English, since it&#039;s the language that opens doors. Again, in a generation, no more French. It would be as rare as someone speaking Latin. 
To Manuel: Your wife took your child to Québec KNOWING he would only be allowed to attend a French school. Think about that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 20 year old from QC and 100% French and proud of it. If you are against the language law, it&#8217;s that you are against French. If you look at New Brunswick, the percentage of the population who speaks French diminishes every day. Once this generation has passed, how many of mine will keep speaking French. Our businesses have to deal with the rest of the country everyday so English is a must. Not having the law, do you really think people would keep learning it? And with the lowering birth rate (due to schooling, careers and people waiting to be older to have children) we are under the reproduction rate. That means more immigrants will have to come in. They would of course, learn English, since it&#8217;s the language that opens doors. Again, in a generation, no more French. It would be as rare as someone speaking Latin.<br />
To Manuel: Your wife took your child to Québec KNOWING he would only be allowed to attend a French school. Think about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Berlanga</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel Berlanga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stan,

Bill 101 and Bill 104 are partially good in the sense that they protect the right of French speaking people, but at expenses of English speakers and allophones. I move to Ontario 10 years ago and for reasons BEYOND my control I have to move to Quebec (my wife took my kid here &quot;temporarly&quot; then divorced me). I speak no French, but I have not right to educate my son in English because I was not born in Canada. I did not come to Qubec, I came to Ontario, and by cirrcumstances had to came. Why the government is going to control the language of education of MY kid? Why the government is going to control the language of a sign I want to put in my business?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stan,</p>
<p>Bill 101 and Bill 104 are partially good in the sense that they protect the right of French speaking people, but at expenses of English speakers and allophones. I move to Ontario 10 years ago and for reasons BEYOND my control I have to move to Quebec (my wife took my kid here &#8220;temporarly&#8221; then divorced me). I speak no French, but I have not right to educate my son in English because I was not born in Canada. I did not come to Qubec, I came to Ontario, and by cirrcumstances had to came. Why the government is going to control the language of education of MY kid? Why the government is going to control the language of a sign I want to put in my business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan squires</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/comment-page-2/#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stan squires]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/bill-101-hum-101-the-school-law/#comment-11870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am from vancouver and i wanted to say that the language problem in Quebec goes back to 1837 when the people in upper and lower canada wanted to get their independence from England like the americans did during their war of independence from 1775-1783.Unfortunality it didn&#039;t work out in canada.It was at that time that Lord Durham from england advised the gov. of england that it would be a good idea to get rid of the french language in canada.England was concerned that canada might get its independence like the U.S.A. did earlier on.
 Ever since then the gov.of canada has been trying to get rid of the french language in Quebec.Bill 101 was a good step forward for the french language,but the canadian gov.didn&#039;t like that bill so it is still trying to block the french language.The supreme court ruling on bill 104 is a slander against the language rights of the french people of Quebec.It should be fought against by all progressive people in canada.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am from vancouver and i wanted to say that the language problem in Quebec goes back to 1837 when the people in upper and lower canada wanted to get their independence from England like the americans did during their war of independence from 1775-1783.Unfortunality it didn&#8217;t work out in canada.It was at that time that Lord Durham from england advised the gov. of england that it would be a good idea to get rid of the french language in canada.England was concerned that canada might get its independence like the U.S.A. did earlier on.<br />
 Ever since then the gov.of canada has been trying to get rid of the french language in Quebec.Bill 101 was a good step forward for the french language,but the canadian gov.didn&#8217;t like that bill so it is still trying to block the french language.The supreme court ruling on bill 104 is a slander against the language rights of the french people of Quebec.It should be fought against by all progressive people in canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

