<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harper Trades Minority Rights for Votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/01/02/harper-financed-attacks-on-quebecs-language-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/01/02/harper-financed-attacks-on-quebecs-language-laws/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: François Perrier</title>
		<link>http://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/01/02/harper-financed-attacks-on-quebecs-language-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[François Perrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angryfrenchguy.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/harper-financed-attacks-on-quebecs-language-laws/#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[le 5 janvier 2005 - To whom this may concern,

Who is this angry French guy anyway ?  If it is Patrick Bourgeois, as one might suspect, since this appears to be his blog, (at least in the introductory capsule in the Internet site Vigile), should not the name Bourgeois appear under each article in this blog ?  If only to clearly separate his texts, from the racist replies he gets from his anglo antagonists and tormentors !? 

But wait --, why does the name Chris Pearson appear less than 2 inches from where I am writing this very note !?  Is Pearson the proverbial Anglo who keeps &quot;peasouper&quot; Bourgeois on a tight leash, to make sure the latter does not perjure himself, as much as he injures the English language ?

&quot;Perjury&quot; (wilfully telling an untruth) is perhaps excessive here, as I struggle to understand, what the hell Bourgeois means, most of the time.  If I am not mentally correcting his errors, grammatical or otherwise, at the same time.

Like John Chretin, Bourgeois appears to be &quot;a perfect bilingual&quot;, that is, we are unable to understand him in either his francified English - nor does his English make any sense, when translated back into French ...

! Hey, don&#039;t get me wrong, some of my best enemies are peasoupers - as a matter of fact - I AM A PEASOUPER !

Once, long ago, in my foolish optimism, I dreamt of creating such a blog, where men of good will from both the Québec and CanadiAn nations would surely be able to reconcile their irreconcilable differences.  How foolish I was !  There are only wronged and hateful people on both sides of the divide, and never shall the twains meet !

One can only hope that you and your French-CanadiAn minions, will soon push us much too far, so that we can &quot;get down to brass tacks&quot;, as Michèle Lalonde expressed it in 1980, in &quot;SPEAK WHITE !&quot;

&quot;Nous sommes un peuple rancunier, mais ne reprochons à personne d&#039;avoir le monopole de la correction de langage, dans la langue douce de Shakespeare, avec l&#039;accent de Longfellow.

... We&#039;re doing all right - we&#039;re doing fine - we are not alone !  Nous savons que nous ne sommes pas seuls !&quot;  FJP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>le 5 janvier 2005 &#8211; To whom this may concern,</p>
<p>Who is this angry French guy anyway ?  If it is Patrick Bourgeois, as one might suspect, since this appears to be his blog, (at least in the introductory capsule in the Internet site Vigile), should not the name Bourgeois appear under each article in this blog ?  If only to clearly separate his texts, from the racist replies he gets from his anglo antagonists and tormentors !? </p>
<p>But wait &#8211;, why does the name Chris Pearson appear less than 2 inches from where I am writing this very note !?  Is Pearson the proverbial Anglo who keeps &#8220;peasouper&#8221; Bourgeois on a tight leash, to make sure the latter does not perjure himself, as much as he injures the English language ?</p>
<p>&#8220;Perjury&#8221; (wilfully telling an untruth) is perhaps excessive here, as I struggle to understand, what the hell Bourgeois means, most of the time.  If I am not mentally correcting his errors, grammatical or otherwise, at the same time.</p>
<p>Like John Chretin, Bourgeois appears to be &#8220;a perfect bilingual&#8221;, that is, we are unable to understand him in either his francified English &#8211; nor does his English make any sense, when translated back into French &#8230;</p>
<p>! Hey, don&#8217;t get me wrong, some of my best enemies are peasoupers &#8211; as a matter of fact &#8211; I AM A PEASOUPER !</p>
<p>Once, long ago, in my foolish optimism, I dreamt of creating such a blog, where men of good will from both the Québec and CanadiAn nations would surely be able to reconcile their irreconcilable differences.  How foolish I was !  There are only wronged and hateful people on both sides of the divide, and never shall the twains meet !</p>
<p>One can only hope that you and your French-CanadiAn minions, will soon push us much too far, so that we can &#8220;get down to brass tacks&#8221;, as Michèle Lalonde expressed it in 1980, in &#8220;SPEAK WHITE !&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Nous sommes un peuple rancunier, mais ne reprochons à personne d&#8217;avoir le monopole de la correction de langage, dans la langue douce de Shakespeare, avec l&#8217;accent de Longfellow.</p>
<p>&#8230; We&#8217;re doing all right &#8211; we&#8217;re doing fine &#8211; we are not alone !  Nous savons que nous ne sommes pas seuls !&#8221;  FJP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

